4

We have and even , but not . Can we have one, please?

Abbiamo e anche , ma non . La potremmo avere, per favore?

2
  • 1
    Isn't it a bit too specific? How many existing questions would potentially use it?
    – Federico Poloni
    Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 21:17
  • @FedericoPoloni Not being used a lot is not a reason not to have a tag, as long as some questions use it, and it is well defined in scope. future-tense seems perfectly fine to me as a concept
    – Denis Nardin Mod
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 9:14

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4

I would be happy to create the tag, but you can do so too (you only need 150 points of reputation on this site). Be careful that tags cannot exist "alone" without questions attached, so the only way to create a tag is to edit (or ask) a question. Do you have any questions in mind that could benefit from the tag ?

Sarei felice di creare il tag, ma anche tu puoi farlo (c'è bisogno di soli 150 punti di reputazione su questo sito). Attenzione che i tag non possono esistere "soli" senza domande collegate, per cui l'unico modo di creare un tag è di modificare (o chiedere) una domanda. Hai qualche domanda in mente che potrebbe beneficiare del tag ?

1
  • 1
    I've seen now your question and I have created the tag (and the synonym in Italian) just by editing it. For the next time: just write the name of the tag as if it existed, and when you submit the question it will pop into existence as if by magic :)
    – Denis Nardin Mod
    Commented Feb 25, 2019 at 17:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .