That was what I meant when I said "Let's wait for some real questions."
Still, the answer to the previous discussion holds: The questions where [f]or instance, there might be doubts about whether a term (and its usage) is dialectal-only or it's an actual Italian term should be considered on-topic.
I'd propose the following good practice:
- answerers should clearly state in their answers that it's a dialectal term (if possible, clarifying also geographic borders of its usage);
- answerers should provide an example of a regular Italian way of saying the same thing;
- answerers should not go into details of etymology, orthography, examples of usage, literature-songs-clerical references for this dialectal term, but only for its Italian analogue;analogue (if needed);
- answerers should not provide analogues from other dialects (e.g., "No, it's the word used in Milano only, but generally we in Lombardia use..." - "Oh, right, it's just like we in Bari say...");
- somebody should tag the question with the "regional" tag if the OP hasn't done it.